| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bugs and bug tracking |
| Date: | 2015-10-07 18:59:08 |
| Message-ID: | 7767.1444244348@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> I *really* don't like the idea of rewriting the From/To completely to
> force all mail through a relay and I'm pretty sure that "fix" would be
> far worse than the problem.
Agreed; but adding a Reply-To: header seems quite reasonable. (Unless
gmail ignores that, which I wouldn't put past it ...)
> One thing which can be easily done with debbugs is that someone can
> forward or bounce the direct email they receive from the user to the
> bug#(at)bugs address and have the info added, if the user removed the bug
> email address.
Right. But that requires the recipient to pay close attention to the
message's cc list, which I have to confess I seldom do. Still, it's
better than nothing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2015-10-07 19:01:26 | Re: bugs and bug tracking |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2015-10-07 18:54:55 | Re: bugs and bug tracking |