Re: Online checksums patch - once again

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Online checksums patch - once again
Date: 2019-09-30 14:59:00
Message-ID: CABUevEykntHnq7bg49P68xXrcvhn+YaPQJwbbq4nvoGd4Uyz4Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 2:49 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 01:03:20PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:48 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On 2019-Aug-26, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>
> >> > OK, let's try this again :)
> >> >
> >> > This is work mainly based in the first version of the online checksums
> >> > patch, but based on top of Andres WIP patchset for global barriers (
> >> >
> >>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20181030051643.elbxjww5jjgnjaxg%40alap3.anarazel.de
> >> > )
> >> >
> >> > Andres patch has been enhanced with wait events per
> >> >
> >>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABUevEwy4LUFqePC5YzanwtzyDDpYvgrj6R5WNznwrO5ouVg1w%40mail.gmail.com
> >> > .
> >>
> >> Travis says your SGML doesn't compile (maybe you just forgot to "git
> >> add" and edit allfiles.sgml?):
> >>
> >
> >Nope, even easier -- the reference pgVerifyChecksums was renamed to
> >pgChecksums and for some reason we missed that in the merge.
> >
> >I've rebased again on top of todays master, but that was the only change I
> >had to make.
> >
> >
> >Other than bots, this patch doesn't seem to have attracted any reviewers
> >> this time around. Perhaps you need to bribe someone? (Maybe "how sad
> >> your committer SSH key stopped working" would do?)
> >>
> >
> >Hmm. I don't think that's a bribe, that's a threat. However, maybe it will
> >work.
> >
>
> IMHO the patch is ready to go - I think the global barrier solves the
> issue in the previous version, and that's the only problem I'm aware of.
> So +1 from me to go ahead and push it.
>

Not to downvalue your review, but I'd really appreciate a review from
someone who was one of the ones who spotted the issue initially.

Especially -- Andres, any chance I can bribe you to take another look?

And now please uncomment my commit SSH key again, please ;-)
>

I'll consider it...

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-09-30 15:56:07 Re: Optimize partial TOAST decompression
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2019-09-30 14:58:52 Re: Online checksums patch - once again