From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | depesz <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, "w^3" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: mail to pgsql-general lost? |
Date: | 2012-08-16 14:14:41 |
Message-ID: | CABUevExCf6cV6S-w5TjjxE7yNz0YmLqpVXq0qG29aqqH+PtBVQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of jue ago 16 09:46:28 -0400 2012:
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Is there a way to find out how big it was? IIRC, depesz wrote
>> something about cutting the size down for the second message - maybe
>> it got rejected because it was too big?
>
> The maximum allowed message length seems to be 40000 bytes (except for
> lists that have raised it explicitely such as pgsql-hackers). Should we
> raise that limit?
I think the important thing is:
1) can we define two limits, one that just ends up being moderated
instead of rejected?
and
2) the system should *tell* depesz that it was too big, somehow.Is that broken?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-08-16 14:28:52 | Re: mail to pgsql-general lost? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-08-16 14:08:47 | Re: mail to pgsql-general lost? |