From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | depesz <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: mail to pgsql-general lost? |
Date: | 2012-08-16 14:28:52 |
Message-ID: | 1345126937-sup-9480@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of jue ago 16 10:14:41 -0400 2012:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of jue ago 16 09:46:28 -0400 2012:
> >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> >> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Is there a way to find out how big it was? IIRC, depesz wrote
> >> something about cutting the size down for the second message - maybe
> >> it got rejected because it was too big?
> >
> > The maximum allowed message length seems to be 40000 bytes (except for
> > lists that have raised it explicitely such as pgsql-hackers). Should we
> > raise that limit?
>
> I think the important thing is:
> 1) can we define two limits, one that just ends up being moderated
> instead of rejected?
Yes, I think we can do that.
> and
> 2) the system should *tell* depesz that it was too big, somehow.Is that broken?
I don't really know the answer to this. Yes, it should send out an
email informing of the problem. Not sure why it's not working.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-16 14:47:30 | Re: mail to pgsql-general lost? |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-08-16 14:14:41 | Re: mail to pgsql-general lost? |