From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Permission failures with WAL files in 13~ on Windows |
Date: | 2021-03-16 10:40:12 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEwcjiawYEEU7n7_VyCPVYYd8cx2xq8TVVmsuRLxsQ0HFA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:22 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:02:25AM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > If you back out that patch, does the problem you can reproduce with
> > archive_command go away?
>
> That's the first thing I did after seeing the failure, and I saw
> nothing after 2~3 hours of pgbench :)
:) That's at least an "almost".
> The second thing I did was to revert back to HEAD with more logging in
> the area, but I was not able to see my error again. Perhaps I just
> need to put more load, there are still too many guesses and not enough
> facts.
Agreed.
> > I agree with your analysis in general. It certainly seems to hit right
> > in the center of the problem scope.
> >
> > Maybe hardlinks on Windows has yet another "weird behaviour" vs what
> > we're used to from Unix.
>
> Yeah, I'd like to think that this is a rational explanation, and
> that's why I was just focusing on reproducing this issue rather
> reliably as a first step.
Yeah, it'd definitely be good to figure out exactly what it is that
triggers the issue.
> > It would definitely be more useful if we could figure out *when* this
> > happens. But failing that, I wonder if we could find a way to provide
> > a build with this patch backed out for the bug reporters to test out,
> > given they all seem to have it fairly well reproducible. (But I am
> > assuming are unlikely to be able to create their own builds easily,
> > given the complexity of doing so on Windows). Given that this is a
> > pretty isolated change, it should hopefully be easy enough to back out
> > for testing.
>
> There is a large pool of bug reporters, hopefully one of them may be
> able to help..
I think you're overestimating peoples ability to get our build going
on Windows :)
If we can provide a new .EXE built with exactly the same flags as the
EDB downloads that they can just drop into a directory, I think it's a
lot easier to get that done.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-03-16 11:04:35 | Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-03-16 10:37:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods |