Re: git author vs committer

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: git author vs committer
Date: 2012-09-13 07:00:14
Message-ID: CABUevEwWF1CEJ588tsUCVdOSbmuSbB=YixNjAK4QJSQWk3P+gw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 19:13 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Just to be clear, what you're saying is we want to change the policy
>> that says "committer must be on list of approved committers &&
>> commiter==author" to "committer must be on list of approved committers
>> && author must be on list of approved committers"?
>
> Yes, that would be my request.

Definitely sounds like a reasonable thing to do. So unless there are
objections, I'll try to get around to getting that done not too long
from now.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2012-09-13 07:56:45 Re: Move postgresql_fdw_validator into dblink
Previous Message Francois Tigeot 2012-09-13 06:30:03 SYSV shared memory vs mmap performance