| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint |
| Date: | 2017-02-27 15:20:47 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEwVsphx0vnKPOBjRHxhMZ0yrbmZjurLOuh+kWa91sP96Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Michael Banck <
> michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
> > wrote:
> >> ISTM the consensus is that there should be no output in regular mode,
> >> but a message should be displayed in verbose and progress mode.
>
> > Agreed, and applied as one patch.
>
> Is there an argument for back-patching this?
>
Seems you were typing that at the same time as we did.
I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take your
comment as a vote that we should back-patch it?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-02-27 15:22:43 | Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-02-27 15:10:38 | Re: Seems bug in postgres_fdw? |