Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint
Date: 2017-02-27 15:22:43
Message-ID: 23988.1488208963@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Is there an argument for back-patching this?

> I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take your
> comment as a vote that we should back-patch it?

Yeah, I'd vote for it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2017-02-27 15:23:46 Re: PGSERVICEFILE as a connection string parameter
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2017-02-27 15:20:47 Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint