Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

>
>
> On 03/03/2016 09:02 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Microsoft provides a set of VMs that one can use for testing and
>> Windows 10 is in the set:
>> https://dev.windows.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/tools/vms/windows/
>> I have grabbed one and installed the community version of Visual
>> Studio 2015 so I think that I am going to be able to compile Postgres
>> with VS2015 with a bit of black magic.
>>
>> My goal is double:
>> 1) As far as things have been discussed, VS2015 is making difficult
>> the compilation of Postgres, particularly for locales. So I'd like to
>> see what are the problems behind that and see if we can patch it
>> properly. This would facilitate the integration of cmake as well for
>> Windows.
>> 2) src/tools/msvc stuff has support only up to VS2013. I think that it
>> would be nice to bump that a bit and get something for 9.5~.
>>
>> So, would there be interest for a patch on the perl scripts in
>> src/tools/msvc or are they considered a lost cause? Having a look at
>> the failures could be done with the cmake work, but it seems a bit
>> premature to me to look at that for the moment, and having support for
>> VS2015 with 9.5 (support for new versions of VS won a backpatch the
>> last couple of years) would be a good thing I think.
>>
>
>
>
> I am not holding my breath on cmake. Until we have something pretty solid
> on that front I'm going to assume it's not happening. If we're going to
> support VS2015 (and I think we should) then it should be supported for all
> live branches if possible. I'm assuming the changes would be pretty
> localized, at least in src/tools/msvc, and adding a new compile shouldn't
> break anything with existing compilers.
>
>
+1.

Definitely do it for HEAD.

Then if it gets backpatched is going to depend on the locality I think. If
it's just the build system then it should be no problem, but I thought
Michael also suggested some API changes. If that's so, then it is going to
depend on how invasive those are. But that part should be done for HEAD
regardless, so it's definitely worth the effort to figure out exactly what
it involves.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/