From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Mail thread references in commits |
Date: | 2016-11-20 16:34:21 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEw7UVYwj5TkChqCvz-PPV0boTWTJLyYZFVTCpaHv35v+A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > On 11/20/2016 06:55 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> We can replace the website part with a http://postgr.es/m/<messageid>
> >> which will make it a bit shorter and still as easy to generate from
> >> the client side and to search off.
>
> > That's 19 extra characters, less 2 if you remove the <> delimiters. I
> > think the extra usability makes the slight increase in ugliness worth
> > it. Can we just agree or disagree on this?
>
> I'm prepared to go along with this if there's general agreement.
> However, maybe we should make it actually work first, because I
> get a 404 from
>
> http://postgr.es/m/29df5b73-d823-ade4-cb17-47142742a83c@dunslane.net
>
> which ought to be the URL for your message. I tried the same experiment
> for some of the older messages in this thread, and those are 404 too.
>
Right, it hasn't been set up yet. Pending the actual outcome of this thread.
> BTW, should it be "http:" or "https:"?
>
As of today both should work, so it should be https.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-11-20 16:39:39 | Re: How to change order sort of table in HashJoin |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-11-20 16:26:55 | Re: Mail thread references in commits |