| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Mail thread references in commits |
| Date: | 2016-11-20 16:26:55 |
| Message-ID: | 17779.1479659215@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 11/20/2016 06:55 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> We can replace the website part with a http://postgr.es/m/<messageid>
>> which will make it a bit shorter and still as easy to generate from
>> the client side and to search off.
> That's 19 extra characters, less 2 if you remove the <> delimiters. I
> think the extra usability makes the slight increase in ugliness worth
> it. Can we just agree or disagree on this?
I'm prepared to go along with this if there's general agreement.
However, maybe we should make it actually work first, because I
get a 404 from
http://postgr.es/m/29df5b73-d823-ade4-cb17-47142742a83c@dunslane.net
which ought to be the URL for your message. I tried the same experiment
for some of the older messages in this thread, and those are 404 too.
BTW, should it be "http:" or "https:"?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-11-20 16:34:21 | Re: Mail thread references in commits |
| Previous Message | Mithun Cy | 2016-11-20 16:08:12 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |