| From: | Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vitaly Davydov <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Deadlock detector fails to activate on a hot standby replica |
| Date: | 2026-06-25 13:36:17 |
| Message-ID: | CABPTF7V2wgjqN6g99uxR_RjGYCLo07e8ogWWTyAqMfzAGg5j_g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Fujii-san, Vitaly,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 8:14 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 12:16 AM Vitaly Davydov
> <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Fujii Masao
> >
> > I've prepared patches of v6 for other majors. I hope, it will help.
Thanks for working on this. I haven't looked into the patch in detail
yet. The overall direction seems good to me. Here are two comments on
the first look:
1) It looks that this patch is doing some refactoring around
LockBufferForCleanup. The part being touched seems flaky itself on
HEAD, should we fix the issue in the buffer side first? [1]
> Thanks for the patches for the stable branches!
>
> I noticed that you added "buf_state &= ~BM_PIN_COUNT_WAITER;" to
> BufferIsReadyForCleanup(). Could you tell me why that's necessary? My
> understanding was that LockBufferForCleanup() is responsible for
> clearing that flag, so I didn't think it was needed here.
>
> But if it is necessary, I'd like to make the same change in master as
> well, to keep the code as consistent as possible between master and
> the stable branches.
2) buf_state &= ~BM_PIN_COUNT_WAITER in stable versions seems not
necessary to me as LockBufferForCleanup will handle the clearing for
us.
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/7685519a-0bf9-4e17-93ca-7e3aa10fa29c%40gmail.com
--
Regards,
Xuneng Zhou
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sebastiaan Mannem | 2026-06-25 13:43:32 | Re: Out-of-Cycle release? (was Re: BUG #19490: Streaming standby on 16.14 stops applying WAL on MultiXactOffsetSLRU when primary is 16.8) |
| Previous Message | Arne Roland | 2026-06-25 13:35:00 | Re: Key joins |