Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE

From: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE
Date: 2017-04-28 11:53:07
Message-ID: CABOikdNn6Bhm0T=zggdMoSi=J2ZqhiK+F0Y6Q3+Opq3dhdiXjA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk
> wrote:

> >>>>> "Pavan" == Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> Pavan> I am attaching a patch that throws a similar ERROR during
> Pavan> planning even for 9.5. AFAICS in presence of grouping sets, we
> Pavan> always decide to use sort-based implementation for grouping, but
> Pavan> do not check if the columns support ordering or not.
>
> Hmmm. This is obviously my fault somewhere... the patch looks good, I'll
> deal with it shortly.
>

JFR this got fixed via 7be3678a8cfb55dcfca90fa586485f835ab912a5

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2017-04-28 12:26:53 Re: scram and \password
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2017-04-28 11:41:41 Re: On How To Shorten the Steep Learning Curve Towards PG Hacking...