Re: doc: Document Linux cgroup memory limits

From: Joao Detomini <joao(dot)detomini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Manu <manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: doc: Document Linux cgroup memory limits
Date: 2026-10-05 02:17:24
Message-ID: CABH8dKw9vkgTfV9FApnAwAvxyntgyaRTCV=mZqZ93v8=1tYWpg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Manu,

Thanks for the quick response. Attached v4 with both points: the systemd
OOMPolicy note, and the oom_score_adj -1000 exemption for the group
kill, with a pointer to the overcommit section. I also resolved the
ambiguity
that arose after this new insertion.

Regards,
João Marcelo

Em dom., 4 de out. de 2026 às 22:19, Manu <manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com>
escreveu:

> Hi João,
>
> Thanks for v3. The new sentence is right, and the docs build. Going
> through the whole section once more, two cases behave differently
> from what it says; I should have raised them with v2.
>
> > If that is a server process other than the postmaster, the
> > postmaster treats it as a crash and, unless restart_after_crash is
> > turned off, restarts all server processes, disconnecting all sessions.
>
> Not when the server runs as a systemd service, which is a common way
> to set a memory limit outside containers. systemd's OOMPolicy applies
> too, and its default, stop, stops the whole service after an OOM kill.
> With MemoryMax=400M and no OOMPolicy set, two of three runs ended with
> "received smart shutdown request" and the unit in the oom-kill failed
> state, and the third was already deactivating; with
> OOMPolicy=continue, the postmaster restarted all three times. Perhaps
> add:
>
> If the server runs as a systemd service, systemd's OOMPolicy setting
> also applies; its default, stop, stops the whole service instead.
>
> > If memory.oom.group is set for the cgroup, [...] the OOM killer
> > instead terminates all processes of the cgroup, including the
> > postmaster.
>
> The kernel exempts processes whose oom_score_adj is -1000 from the
> group kill, and that is what linux-memory-overcommit recommends for
> the postmaster. With the postmaster at -1000 and memory.oom.group set
> to 1, the group kill happened but the postmaster survived and
> restarted the other processes, in three runs out of three. Inside a
> container the postmaster usually cannot lower its own score, so the
> Kubernetes case stays as you describe. Perhaps:
>
> ... the OOM killer instead terminates all processes of the cgroup
> except those with an oom_score_adj of -1000, so the postmaster too,
> unless it is protected as described in
> <xref linkend="linux-memory-overcommit"/>.
>
> Regards,
> Manu
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-doc-Document-Linux-cgroup-memory-limits.patch application/octet-stream 4.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manu 2026-10-05 02:23:36 Re: doc: Document Linux cgroup memory limits
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-10-05 02:14:36 Re: injection_points: canceled or terminated waiters leak their wait slots