Re: [DOC] add missing "[ NO ]" to various "DEPENDS ON" synopses

From: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOC] add missing "[ NO ]" to various "DEPENDS ON" synopses
Date: 2021-02-15 06:52:31
Message-ID: CAB8KJ=j-uK3EdPFo-mv0Yg6D_gETNj1LJBgE=5Nqnc76-mWaDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2021年2月13日(土) 11:52 Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>:

> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:32:14AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> > In the documentation, the "[ NO ]" option is listed in the synopsis for
> > ALTER TRIGGER and ALTER FUNCTION, but not the others.
> > Trivial patch attached.
>
> There are two flavors to cover for 6 commands per gram.y, and you are
> covering all of them. So this looks good to me. I'll apply and
> backpatch in a bit. It is worth noting that tab-complete.c does a bad
> job in completing those clauses.
> --
> Michael
>

--
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2021-02-15 06:57:04 Re: [DOC] add missing "[ NO ]" to various "DEPENDS ON" synopses
Previous Message vignesh C 2021-02-15 06:23:00 Re: logical replication seems broken