Re: [BUGS] BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2015-07-04 13:45, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>>
>>> Well for indexes you don't really need to add the new AT command, as
>>> IndexStmt has char *idxcomment which it will automatically uses as
>>> comment
>>> if not NULL. While I am not huge fan of the idxcomment it doesn't seem
>>> to
>>> be easy to remove it in the future and it's what transformTableLikeClause
>>> uses so it might be good to be consistent with that.
>>
>>
>> Oh, right, I completely missed your point and this field in IndexStmt.
>> Yes it is better to be consistent in this case and to use it. It makes
>> as well the code easier to follow.
>> Btw, regarding the new AT routines, I am getting find of them, it
>> makes easier to follow which command is added where in the command
>> queues.
>>
>> Updated patch attached.
>>
>
> Cool, I am happy with the patch now. Marking as ready for committer.

Thanks for the review.
--
Michael