| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #14849: jsonb_build_object doesn't like VARIADIC calls very much |
| Date: | 2017-10-13 13:15:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTppc5w2nX7jaSu94V+VHfThbvRq12hmLrSiiN6ii1spA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Shouldn't `jsonb_build_object` and `jsonb_build_array` be strict in this
> patch?
Oh, right. I thought that those were marked as strict already. Their
type cannot be changed in back-branches, but can be on HEAD. While I
agree that build_object should return NULL in this case, what about
build_array? Should it return [NULL] (empty array), or just NULL? I
would think the latter but this can be debated.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-10-13 13:48:09 | Re: BUG #14849: jsonb_build_object doesn't like VARIADIC calls very much |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2017-10-13 12:46:59 | Re: BUG #14849: jsonb_build_object doesn't like VARIADIC calls very much |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexey Chernyshov | 2017-10-13 13:37:32 | Re: new function for tsquery creartion |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2017-10-13 12:46:59 | Re: BUG #14849: jsonb_build_object doesn't like VARIADIC calls very much |