| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Potential data loss of 2PC files |
| Date: | 2017-01-03 12:08:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTo1hDJSSKUxTFPKubcwB+Uq4Ce_68DoyU+f0mcA=CX-g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Are you talking about
> /*
> * Now we can mark ourselves as out of the commit critical section: a
> * checkpoint starting after this will certainly see the gxact as a
> * candidate for fsyncing.
> */
> MyPgXact->delayChkpt = false;
>
> That's while creating the file. I do not see similar code in
> FinishPreparedTransaction() where the 2PC file is removed.
RecordTransactionCommitPrepared() does the same work for COMMIT PREPARED.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2017-01-03 12:11:20 | Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol) |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-01-03 12:06:37 | Re: Measuring replay lag |