Re: Trouble with amcheck

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Douglas Doole <dougdoole(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Trouble with amcheck
Date: 2017-09-15 01:35:15
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTn6r9jg+hEkFFQw479oHtxCchexyEtvyTprknXCHFxbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Yes, I was working with someone earlier today who ran into exactly the
> same issue. If you don't 'make world' or make the individual contrib
> modules, then 'make installcheck-world' isn't going to work.

Or should installcheck-world imply world? It is easy for newcomers or
even advanced hackers to fall into this trap from time to time.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2017-09-15 01:55:25 Re: path toward faster partition pruning
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-09-15 01:33:14 Re: Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10 (upgrading standby servers)