Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Date: 2015-12-09 00:27:42
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTSvSKhOFWNtKxx6ju29N30-V0EEaQQLrxkuuakfW-QBQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:08 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2015-12-08 20:09 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Michael Paquier
>> > <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> >> Thanks, I looked at that again and problem is fixed as attached.
>> >
>> > Er, not exactly... poll_query_until in PostgresNode.pm is using psql
>> > -c without the --no-psqlrc switch so this patch causes the regression
>> > tests of pg_rewind to fail. Fixed as attached.
>>
>> Committed. Go, team.
>>
>> This has been a long time coming.
>
>
> great, thank you very much you and all

Thanks! This is now marked as committed in the CF app...
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message FattahRozzaq 2015-12-09 00:52:41 Re: HELP!!! The WAL Archive is taking up all space
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-09 00:21:15 Re: PostgresNode::_update_pid using undefined variables in tap tests