Re: Commit fest status for 2015-11

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> To committers: there are 4 patches waiting for input.
>
> Those are:
>
> : SQL function to report log message
>
> AFAICT, there is no committer who likes this idea enough to commit it.
> It's questionable whether we need such a feature at all, and it's even
> more questionable whether this particular instantiation of the feature
> is well-designed. I'm not going to opine as to whether it should get
> marked "returned with feedback" or "rejected", but I doubt it's going
> to get committed as-is.

Thanks, that's hard to follow all those threads. Let's cut the apple
in half and mark it as returned with feedback then.

> : Reusing abbreviated keys during second pass of ordered [set] aggregates
>
> Robert has been committer for all the predecessor patches, so I assume
> this one will be his.
>
> : Speedup timestamp/time/date output functions
>
> I'd look into this if Andres hadn't already claimed it ...
>
> : Improving replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records
>
> Heikki and Andres have already reviewed this, so I assume one or the
> other of them will be committer.

OK, if those don't get addressed soon, they will be moved to the next
CF with the same status.
--
Michael