Re: Commit fest status for 2015-11

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commit fest status for 2015-11
Date: 2015-12-22 06:35:11
Message-ID: 29366.1450766111@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> To committers: there are 4 patches waiting for input.

Those are:

: SQL function to report log message

AFAICT, there is no committer who likes this idea enough to commit it.
It's questionable whether we need such a feature at all, and it's even
more questionable whether this particular instantiation of the feature
is well-designed. I'm not going to opine as to whether it should get
marked "returned with feedback" or "rejected", but I doubt it's going
to get committed as-is.

: Reusing abbreviated keys during second pass of ordered [set] aggregates

Robert has been committer for all the predecessor patches, so I assume
this one will be his.

: Speedup timestamp/time/date output functions

I'd look into this if Andres hadn't already claimed it ...

: Improving replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records

Heikki and Andres have already reviewed this, so I assume one or the
other of them will be committer.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2015-12-22 06:52:40 Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-22 06:24:12 Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual