From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jonathon Nelson <jdnelson(at)dyn(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? |
Date: | 2017-04-02 23:38:47 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqT8dQk_Ce29YQ0CKAQ7htLDyUHNdFv6dELe4PkYr3SSjA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> As we are already past the commitfest, I am not sure, what should i change
> the patch status to ?
The commit fest finishes on the 7th of April. Even with the deadline
passed, there is nothing preventing to work on bug fixes. So this item
ought to be moved to the next CF with the same category.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul Coyne | 2017-04-02 23:55:39 | Re: BUG #14609: ON CONSTRAINT (aka UPSERT) code fails when excluded.<columname> used in calculation. |
Previous Message | Venkata B Nagothi | 2017-04-02 22:19:20 | Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-04-02 23:40:08 | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-04-02 22:42:58 | Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators |