Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jonathon Nelson <jdnelson(at)dyn(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?
Date: 2017-04-02 23:38:47
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT8dQk_Ce29YQ0CKAQ7htLDyUHNdFv6dELe4PkYr3SSjA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> As we are already past the commitfest, I am not sure, what should i change
> the patch status to ?

The commit fest finishes on the 7th of April. Even with the deadline
passed, there is nothing preventing to work on bug fixes. So this item
ought to be moved to the next CF with the same category.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Coyne 2017-04-02 23:55:39 Re: BUG #14609: ON CONSTRAINT (aka UPSERT) code fails when excluded.<columname> used in calculation.
Previous Message Venkata B Nagothi 2017-04-02 22:19:20 Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-04-02 23:40:08 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2017-04-02 22:42:58 Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators