Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2016-06-30 23:14:35
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT5MfFkhXt7hS0C3hFsSYaGH1qzqEBp3-Cqz4GewxqDKw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> On 06/30/2016 03:13 AM, Yury Zhuravlev wrote:
>> Only one extra phase (mkdir build). I think it's not so important. For
>> windows and macosx I used cmake GUI it's so easy.
>
> We need this to be scriptable, not using a GUI.

Definitely agreed! Personally I am allergic to any kind of UIs for
development, and I am sure not to be the only one on this list.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-06-30 23:21:24 Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-06-30 22:49:15 Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion