Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion
Date: 2016-06-30 22:49:15
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZD59V9z76cfMDxJFS6pQdL-4UBoEoHQASQEih8ypyvqA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Tom, do you want to commit this, or do you want me to handle it, or
>>> something else?
>>
>> I was not sure if you'd agreed that the patch was correct, and in any
>> case I thought you wanted to fold it into the upperrel consider_parallel
>> patch. I feel no great need to commit it myself, if that's what you
>> meant.
>
> OK, I'll set aside some time for further review and either commit it
> or send an update by COB Thursday US time.

I haven't had a chance to do this yet, so I'm going to do it tomorrow instead.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-06-30 23:14:35 Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-06-30 22:46:45 Re: parallel workers and client encoding