From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Should TIDs be typbyval = FLOAT8PASSBYVAL to speed up CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY? |
Date: | 2015-11-18 00:28:47 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSp7PPVpwAzC44+TyJEv8NPBK5Tz_J0mgK5aSBmEp+1Yw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I seem to be able to produce these sorting patches at a much greater
> rate than they can be committed, in part because Robert is the only
> one that ever reviews them, and he is only one person. Since you think
> the patch is good work, perhaps you can find the time to formally
> review it.
Finding reviewing volunteers is a good thing, particularly on these
times where we tend to have more patches than reviews, however I would
suggest prioritizing the older items by beginning in what is in the
current CF (47 items waiting for review at I write this message), 3
patches for the sorting work.
FWIW, I think that this series of patches is interesting and have high
value because particularly I have seen clear improvements particularly
with raw dumps on schemas with many indexes (disclaimer: I am the guy
Peter talked to regarding this patch though this was not on the top
head nor of my TODOs).
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2015-11-18 00:44:48 | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-11-18 00:18:54 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Cause TestLib.pm to define $windows_os in all branches. |