Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
Date: 2016-03-04 04:54:18
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSk3fb3ea8pGmN_L3wp3Gf38JNsduxmUj-or9iJG+i6xQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 4 March 2016 at 05:08, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Patches 0004 and 0007 remain.
>
> For readers who're not following closely that's the filtering support for
> RecursiveCopy and the support for taking filesystem-level backups in
> PostgresNode that uses it.

I am still not sure that the filter for pg_log by default is that useful but...

>> I think 0007 is uncontroversial; I
>> reworked 0004 a bit and gave it to someone else to finish a couple of
>> didn't I didn't quite like -- hopefully she'll be submitting a new
>> version soonish. Once we have that I'm happy to push them too.
>
> Great, thanks.

No objections from here as well for the feature itself. I am glad to
see interest in extending the current infrastructure, and just
wondering what kind of tests are going to show up.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2016-03-04 05:06:31 Re: Relation extension scalability
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-03-04 04:29:21 Re: proposal: psql autocomplete for casting