| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com, horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp, jdnelson(at)dyn(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? |
| Date: | 2017-03-30 00:41:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSfXcptn-V-KGvh1GShRF42Tdv9Nfdjcr1NdH8h1rxJVQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Committers will not apply patches which has trailing whitespace
> issues. So the patch submitter needs to fix them anyway.
I cannot comment on that point (committers are free to pick up things
the way they want), but just using git commands to apply a patch
should not be an obstacle for a review if a patch can be easily
applied as long as they roughly respect GNU's diff format.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2017-03-30 00:51:47 | Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? |
| Previous Message | Venkata B Nagothi | 2017-03-30 00:12:56 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2017-03-30 00:51:47 | Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? |
| Previous Message | Venkata B Nagothi | 2017-03-30 00:12:56 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? |