Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com, horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp, jdnelson(at)dyn(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?
Date: 2017-03-30 00:51:47
Message-ID: 20170330.095147.1660425449608313162.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Committers will not apply patches which has trailing whitespace
>> issues. So the patch submitter needs to fix them anyway.
>
> I cannot comment on that point (committers are free to pick up things
> the way they want), but just using git commands to apply a patch
> should not be an obstacle for a review if a patch can be easily
> applied as long as they roughly respect GNU's diff format.

My point is, the coding standard. Having trainling whitespace is
against our coding standard and committers should not accept such a
code, I believe.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-03-30 04:51:56 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-03-30 00:41:30 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2017-03-30 01:00:02 Re: Refactor handling of database attributes between pg_dump and pg_dumpall
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-03-30 00:41:30 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?