Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problems when copying files >2GB.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problems when copying files >2GB.
Date: 2017-08-29 02:22:12
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSSq2_e4DjyR4sKgOoNGxewueF82np4EPHG8cF1tt4yLw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I am fine with however you want to handle it, but it seems odd to me
>>> that we don't have a way of embedding INT64_FORMAT in a translatable
>>> string. Surely that's going to be a problem in some case, sometime,
>>> isn't it?
>>
>> The way we do that elsewhere is to print out the value to a string
>> variable and then use %s in the translatable message.
>
> Hmm. OK. That doesn't sound great, but if there's no better option...

I don't like breaking the abstraction of pg_log() with the existing
flags with some kind of pg_debug() layer. The set of APIs present now
in pg_rewind for logging is nice to have, and I think that those debug
messages should be translated. So what about the attached?
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
rewind-int64-log.patch application/octet-stream 998 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-08-29 02:26:24 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problems when copying files >2GB.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-08-28 21:30:47 pgsql: Stamp 9.2.23.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-08-29 02:26:24 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problems when copying files >2GB.
Previous Message yangjie 2017-08-29 02:19:12 Re: [POC] hash partitioning