Re: Declarative partitioning

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
Date: 2015-12-02 07:36:45
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSQB9O2mj6jf-LgY80inebRTu_riqKWUvZsydKKeNpmmQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2015/12/02 15:41, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> It seems that the consensus is to rework a bit more this patch.
>> Returned with feedback then?
>
> Yes, as far as this commitfest is concerned. Or "moved to the next
> commitfest"? Not sure exactly which makes sense.

OK, then, switched as returned with feedback.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2015-12-02 08:00:57 Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual
Previous Message Noah Misch 2015-12-02 07:03:10 Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.