Re: Declarative partitioning

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
Date: 2015-12-02 06:55:35
Message-ID: 565E95E7.8010007@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015/12/02 15:41, Michael Paquier wrote:
> It seems that the consensus is to rework a bit more this patch.
> Returned with feedback then?

Yes, as far as this commitfest is concerned. Or "moved to the next
commitfest"? Not sure exactly which makes sense.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2015-12-02 07:03:10 Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-02 06:41:15 Re: Declarative partitioning