Re: COPY command with RLS bug

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COPY command with RLS bug
Date: 2016-10-01 12:41:17
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSEtU9NJ3rAFjAGwQzwZknuC+zjnEs3eWOaUTMf5XUxMQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Comments and testing welcome, of course, though it's looking pretty good
> to me at this point and I'll likely commit it in another day or two
> unless issues are found.

+ * nodes/value.h) that correspond to the column name
"correspondS"?

Except that, it looks good to me.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-01 12:52:25 Re: PoC: Make it possible to disallow WHERE-less UPDATE and DELETE
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-10-01 12:15:05 Re: On conflict update & hint bits