Re: Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
Date: 2017-09-10 08:30:14
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRgzeCjagJHuo+LKAB0dRenwQX2d76c4x0uXfLYEA1gfg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think here we should first agree on what we want to do. Based on
> Tom's comment, I was thinking of changing comments in btree/hash part
> and additionally for hash indexes, I can see if we can pass
> REGBUF_STANDARD for all usages of metapage. I am not sure if we want
> similar exercise for btree as well.

Changing only comments for now looks like a good idea to me.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2017-09-10 09:29:13 Re: log_destination=file
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2017-09-10 07:50:45 Re: WIP: Separate log file for extension