Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands
Date: 2017-09-13 07:16:32
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRd+VJmsGfd9fCeisfinVs+Pbe1MjGrOxSQftef5Fa9eQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> On 9/12/17, 9:47 PM, "Michael Paquier" <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Those are minor points. The patch seems to be in good shape, and
>> passes all my tests, including some pgbench'ing to make sure that
>> nothing goes weird. So I'll be happy to finally switch both patches to
>> "ready for committer" once those minor points are addressed.
>
> Awesome.

OK, let's roll in then. There are a couple of points or comments that
could be tweaked like the name of get_rel_oids, but I usually have bad
taste when it comes to that, and the current things make sense as
well. So both patches are now marked as ready for committer.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-09-13 07:20:36 Re: Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-09-13 07:07:59 Re: Constraint exclusion for partitioned tables