Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups
Date: 2015-11-26 12:03:53
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRT3dqctXcFmXvcZaoL8M6R-CaTg3QSodr1U+tmbdoyCA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I'm only talking about the actual value in pg_stat_replication here, not
> what we are using internally. These are two different things of course -
> let's keep them separate for now. In pg_stat_replication, we explicitly
> check for InvalidXLogRecPtr and then explicitly set the resulting value to
> NULL in the SQL return.

No objections from here. I guess you already have a patch?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2015-11-26 12:08:26 Re: Some questions about the array.
Previous Message YUriy Zhuravlev 2015-11-26 10:33:28 Re: WIP: About CMake v2