| From: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Some questions about the array. |
| Date: | 2015-11-26 12:08:26 |
| Message-ID: | 5656F63A.70703@sigaev.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
YUriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> On Friday 06 November 2015 12:55:44 you wrote:
>> Omitted bounds are common in other languages and would be handy. I
>> don't think they'd cause any issues with multi-dimensional arrays or
>> variable start-pos arrays.
>
> And yet, what about my patch?
My vote: let us do it, mean, omitting bounds. It simplifies syntax in rather
popular queries.
> Discussions about ~ and{:} it seems optional.
~ is allowed as unary operator and therefore such syntax will introduce
incompatibily/ambiguity.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rushabh Lathia | 2015-11-26 12:09:19 | Re: Getting sorted data from foreign server for merge join |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-11-26 12:03:53 | Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups |