| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 64-bit queryId? |
| Date: | 2017-10-12 00:46:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRK6v37C2gr0WdaH_ua_8hO5=TdnpzzSoYPhna9f3Ey5Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> v4 looks correct to me. Testing it through (pgbench and some custom
>> queries) I have not spotted issues. If the final decision is to use
>> 64-bit query IDs, then this patch could be pushed.
>
> Cool. Committed, thanks for the review.
The final result looks fine for me. Thanks.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-10-12 01:01:43 | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-10-12 00:28:21 | pgsql: Improve performance of SendRowDescriptionMessage. |