Re: 64-bit queryId?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit queryId?
Date: 2017-10-12 00:05:25
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYqmSBk5CcDztnHCYWZnfQWZG3pRTPA2K+vrqGUGG+Qdw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> v4 looks correct to me. Testing it through (pgbench and some custom
> queries) I have not spotted issues. If the final decision is to use
> 64-bit query IDs, then this patch could be pushed.

Cool. Committed, thanks for the review.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-10-12 00:13:20 Re: pgsql: Add configure infrastructure to detect support for C99's restric
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2017-10-11 23:50:26 Re: [PATCH] Lockable views