Re: PROVE_FLAGS

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PROVE_FLAGS
Date: 2017-05-12 13:00:36
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRBrQ4WKN5UYFscEnYaHm5Kgr-_HXe8GzO+-Kg6tiB5Mg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Does anyone object to me backpatching this? It seems to me kinda crazy
> to have --verbose hardcoded on the back branches and not on the dev branch.

+1. A maximum of consistency with the test code when possible is nice to have.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-05-12 13:02:15 Re: logical replication syntax (was DROP SUBSCRIPTION, query cancellations and slot handling)
Previous Message amul sul 2017-05-12 12:46:33 Re: [POC] hash partitioning