| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PROVE_FLAGS |
| Date: | 2017-05-12 14:07:43 |
| Message-ID: | 17493.1494598063@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Andrew Dunstan
> <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Does anyone object to me backpatching this? It seems to me kinda crazy
>> to have --verbose hardcoded on the back branches and not on the dev branch.
> +1. A maximum of consistency with the test code when possible is nice to have.
No objection here either.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2017-05-12 14:08:04 | Re: Addition of pg_dump --no-publications |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-12 14:05:27 | Re: WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS |