Re: SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade
Date: 2017-05-10 00:06:34
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRBOh_ybXvorg7w+mSU8SZoKePSEAnFmnE-uxs12dvysw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 5/9/17 04:54, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>> I think that it would be nice to fix that even before beta, so
>>> attached is a patch to add --no-subscriptions to pg_dump, pg_dumpall
>>> and pg_restore.
>>
>> Looks okay to me, it's simple enough patch.
>
> Committed, thanks.
>
> (There was some inconsistent variable naming no_subscription vs
> no_subscriptions, which I sorted out.)

Thanks.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2017-05-10 00:25:08 Re: no test coverage for ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER name HANDLER ...
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2017-05-09 23:22:14 Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)