Re: no test coverage for ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER name HANDLER ...

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: no test coverage for ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER name HANDLER ...
Date: 2017-05-10 00:25:08
Message-ID: 62289b8f-a759-d91e-d381-7dc4c2405a17@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/05/09 22:52, Mark Dilger wrote:
>
>> On May 9, 2017, at 12:18 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2017/05/05 9:38, Mark Dilger wrote:
>>> Hackers,
>>>
>>> just FYI, I cannot find any regression test coverage of this part of the grammar, not
>>> even in the contrib/ directory or TAP tests. I was going to submit a patch to help out,
>>> and discovered it is not so easy to do, and perhaps that is why the coverage is missing.
>>
>> I think we could add the coverage by defining a dummy C FDW handler
>> function in regress.c. I see that some other regression tests use C
>> functions defined there, such as test_atomic_ops().
>>
>> What do you think about the attached patch? I am assuming you only meant
>> to add tests for the code in foreigncmds.c (CREATE/ALTER FOREIGN DATA
>> WRAPPER).
>
> Thank you for creating the patch. I only see one small oversight, which is the
> successful case of ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER ... HANDLER ... is still
> not tested. I added one line for that in the attached modification of your patch.

Ah right, thanks.

Adding this to the next commitfest as Ashutosh suggested.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2017-05-10 01:12:15 Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-05-10 00:06:34 Re: SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade