From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: no test coverage for ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER name HANDLER ... |
Date: | 2017-05-10 00:25:08 |
Message-ID: | 62289b8f-a759-d91e-d381-7dc4c2405a17@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/05/09 22:52, Mark Dilger wrote:
>
>> On May 9, 2017, at 12:18 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2017/05/05 9:38, Mark Dilger wrote:
>>> Hackers,
>>>
>>> just FYI, I cannot find any regression test coverage of this part of the grammar, not
>>> even in the contrib/ directory or TAP tests. I was going to submit a patch to help out,
>>> and discovered it is not so easy to do, and perhaps that is why the coverage is missing.
>>
>> I think we could add the coverage by defining a dummy C FDW handler
>> function in regress.c. I see that some other regression tests use C
>> functions defined there, such as test_atomic_ops().
>>
>> What do you think about the attached patch? I am assuming you only meant
>> to add tests for the code in foreigncmds.c (CREATE/ALTER FOREIGN DATA
>> WRAPPER).
>
> Thank you for creating the patch. I only see one small oversight, which is the
> successful case of ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER ... HANDLER ... is still
> not tested. I added one line for that in the attached modification of your patch.
Ah right, thanks.
Adding this to the next commitfest as Ashutosh suggested.
Regards,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2017-05-10 01:12:15 | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-05-10 00:06:34 | Re: SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade |