Re: PATCH: hashjoin - gracefully increasing NTUP_PER_BUCKET instead of batching

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: hashjoin - gracefully increasing NTUP_PER_BUCKET instead of batching
Date: 2015-02-13 07:55:28
Message-ID: CAB7nPqR9BFCVHZfxPSni2z9UJcd+CCZFRM-mESxeh-yhEHtHWA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

> Maybe we can try later again, but there's no poin in keeping this in the
> current CF.
>
> Any objections?
>

None, marked as rejected.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-02-13 07:57:11 Re: Logical Decoding follows timelines
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-02-13 07:52:28 Re: Patch to support SEMI and ANTI join removal