Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Date: 2017-11-16 21:50:34
Message-ID: CAB7nPqR0gdahOGJPnsuZv5tMeX+AbwrvRF1CXofqqk94aRrN+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Pushed 0001, will continue with 0002.

Thanks!
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2017-11-16 22:16:19 Re: [HACKERS] ginInsertCleanup called from vacuum could still miss tuples to be deleted
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2017-11-16 21:40:50 Re: bgwriter_lru_maxpages range in postgresql.conf

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-11-17 19:31:06 Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-11-16 13:47:30 Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256