Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Date: 2017-11-16 13:47:30
Message-ID: 7fe055c6-0885-833b-054d-124e3c3acdf9@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On 11/14/17 03:55, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Attached is a new patch set with the comments from above. On top of
>> that, I have changed a couple of things:
>> - 0001 is unchanged, still the same refactoring for the SSL tests.
>> - 0002 implements tls-unique, now including tests using the default
>> channel binding tls-unique with something in the SSL test suite. This
>> patch also now introduces all the infrastructure to plug in correctly
>> new libpq parameters and more channel binding types.
>> - 0003 is shorter, and introduces a set of libpq parameters useful for
>> tests, taking advantage of 0002. Another case where the connection
>> parameter saslname is useful is to enforce not using channel binding
>> when connecting to a v10 server using a SSL context with a v11 libpq.
>> - 0004 introduces tls-server-end-point.
>> This has required some work to get it shaped as wanted, I am adding it
>> to the next CF, as version 2.
>
> Documentation in protocol.sgml has rotten again as markups need proper
> handling. So rebased.

Pushed 0001, will continue with 0002.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2017-11-16 14:00:14 Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-16 13:17:09 Re: test_session_hooks--1.0.sql file in 'test_session_hooks' needs correction

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-16 21:50:34 Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2017-11-16 13:39:00 Re: Error 'Received resultset tuples, but no field structure for them' on queries subsequent to an error