Re: New functions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Дмитрий Воронин <carriingfate92(at)yandex(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New functions
Date: 2015-09-08 00:21:39
Message-ID: CAB7nPqR+Z3pKO-xAwW4XPPB855JgzGWKS8xe76+pzQSTcMOJ4Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> > By the way, perhaps it would be worth doing similar things for the
>> > other calls of BIO_free and BIO_new, no? I have attached a second
>> > patch.
>>
>> And... This second patch had a stupid mistake making for example
>> ssl_client_dn() fail, so here they are again.
>
> What stupid mistake was this? I checked your 0002 files and they looked
> identical. I just pushed it all the way back to 9.0, after changing the
> elogs to ereports.

Never mind. I cannot recall either.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-09-08 00:24:50 pgsql: contrib/sslinfo: add ssl_extension_info SRF
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2015-09-07 23:55:48 Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions