|From:||Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|To:||Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Дмитрий Воронин <carriingfate92(at)yandex(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: New functions|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > By the way, perhaps it would be worth doing similar things for the
> > other calls of BIO_free and BIO_new, no? I have attached a second
> > patch.
> And... This second patch had a stupid mistake making for example
> ssl_client_dn() fail, so here they are again.
What stupid mistake was this? I checked your 0002 files and they looked
identical. I just pushed it all the way back to 9.0, after changing the
elogs to ereports.
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
|Next Message||Andrew Dunstan||2015-09-07 23:21:07||Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions|
|Previous Message||Alvaro Herrera||2015-09-07 22:06:16||Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix|