From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Дмитрий Воронин <carriingfate92(at)yandex(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New functions |
Date: | 2015-09-07 22:31:48 |
Message-ID: | 20150907223148.GX2912@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > By the way, perhaps it would be worth doing similar things for the
> > other calls of BIO_free and BIO_new, no? I have attached a second
> > patch.
>
> And... This second patch had a stupid mistake making for example
> ssl_client_dn() fail, so here they are again.
What stupid mistake was this? I checked your 0002 files and they looked
identical. I just pushed it all the way back to 9.0, after changing the
elogs to ereports.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-09-07 23:21:07 | Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-09-07 22:06:16 | Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix |