Re: New functions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Дмитрий Воронин <carriingfate92(at)yandex(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New functions
Date: 2015-09-07 22:31:48
Message-ID: 20150907223148.GX2912@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > By the way, perhaps it would be worth doing similar things for the
> > other calls of BIO_free and BIO_new, no? I have attached a second
> > patch.
> And... This second patch had a stupid mistake making for example
> ssl_client_dn() fail, so here they are again.

What stupid mistake was this? I checked your 0002 files and they looked
identical. I just pushed it all the way back to 9.0, after changing the
elogs to ereports.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-09-07 23:21:07 Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-09-07 22:06:16 Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix