From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Date: | 2016-02-04 19:49:11 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqR+TV9BtLTEomAu-ExnKaBbKORKV1JXyK_nyF0ORKP4EQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Yes, please let's use the custom language, and let's not care of not
>> more than 1 level of nesting so as it is possible to represent
>> pg_stat_replication in a simple way for the user.
>
> "not" is used twice in this sentence in a way that renders me not able
> to be sure that I'm not understanding it not properly.
4 times here. Score beaten.
Sorry. Perhaps I am tired... I was just wondering if it would be fine
to only support configurations up to one level of nested objects, like
that:
2[node1, node2, node3]
node1, 2[node2, node3], node3
In short, we could restrict things so as we cannot define a group of
nodes within an existing group.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-04 20:06:36 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-04 19:40:11 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |