Re: Remaining 9.5 open items

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remaining 9.5 open items
Date: 2015-11-30 23:31:14
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQzVfo7RAsKpAFe7nYDZnBSzOhpy=11QwN5WvKAfuyGGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> * pg_rewind exiting with error code 1 when source and target are on the same timeline
>
> Is this a new-in-9.5 bug, or a pre-existing problem? If the latter,
> I'm not sure it's a release blocker.

pg_rewind has been introduced in 9.5. It would be good to get
something consistent before GA.

> * Relation files of unlogged relation for btree and spgist indexes not initialized after promotion
>
> Again, is this a release blocker? It's evidently a very old bug.

Actually for 9.5 it could be said so. The approach proposed by Andres
and that I have patched requires a bump of the WAL format. It would be
nice to get that into 9.5 tree. Or 9.5 will have to use a solution
similar to the back branches, which would be something like syncing
unconditionally INIT_FORKNUM at replay after replaying its FPW.
Thoughts welcome on the dedicated thread.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-11-30 23:37:48 Re: gincostestimate and hypothetical indexes
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2015-11-30 23:04:27 Re: On-demand running query plans using auto_explain and signals